From the Fauxhaus Blog:
The Emperor's Wife Has No Clothes...
"New York (AFP) - The New York Post on Monday ran a front-page picture of potential first lady Melania Trump naked, prompting criticism on social media and charges of misogyny."
As Althouse commented in an earlier post: " I've spent hours and hours in classes with nude models. It was considered a serious and lofty activity."
Now, the introduction of props might confuse matters a bit, but sometimes a banana IS just a banana.
Not that a banana was involved: the missing banana is simply a metaphor for the usage of a banana as a symbol. And isn't the exhibitionistic outrage of some just a symbol of outrage, false outrage as a fetish of desiring real outrage?
Or -- as Dylan might have said: "But even the Wife of the President of the United States Sometimes must have to stand naked..."
I am Laslo.
ADDED:
Woman Eating a Banana. (SFW)
Is this Art? Pornography? Advertising?
All three, depending on the Viewer?
Or is Advertising Pornography in itself?
And is Art simply Advertising, as in advertising the talent of the Artist?
Can a woman eat a banana without being imbued with sexual context?
These are questions for considering when you drink a banana smoothie free of innuendo on your way to work this morning....
I am Laslo.
https://althouse.blogspot.com/2016/07/i-had-such-fun-out-among.html
I did not need to be reminded of what happens to a banana before it becomes a smoothie.
ReplyDelete